Support Dave Osler in court

As noticed last year, Dave Osler has had a libel suit brought against him. This Friday he has the chance to get the case dismissed and he wants your support:

A STRIKE-OUT action designed to kill off the libel case brought against me by Tower Hamlets Tory activist Johanna ‘Schwarzwälder Kirschtorte’ Kaschke will be heard at the Royal Courts of Justice on Friday 23rd April, probably before Mr Justice Eady.

If any of you are available on the day, I would appreciate it if you could get along. As the Simon Singh case demonstrated, a visible display of public support can be helpful in these matters. What’s more, the proceedings might well prove to be not entirely unentertaining. Oh, and the first round afterwards is on me.

I’ll post details of room and time on this website as soon as I get them, which will probably be on Thursday afternoon. Thanks, good people.

Your Happening World (15)

Easter weekend happenings:

  • The Dutch government has released (almost) its entire internet presence under a Creative Commons Zero licence, putting it in the public domain. As Dutch internet law expert Arnoud Engelfriet explains (in Dutch, natch), they didn’t need to do this as by law any government work is in the public domain, but this makes it explicit.
  • A few days ago Nick Cohen was busy upbraidign an obscure student for publishing a thesis critical of the work of Canadian Women for Women in Afghanistan. This after he helped smear Amnesty International not a mere two months ago. Now he’s after Joanna Lumley for erm helping the Ghurka veterans getting their pensions. There’s no pleasing the guy.
  • Christian wannabe-terrorists are weird.
  • Jamie points out that being shocked at Catholic Church officials comparing the uproar about pedo priests to anti-semitism is just what they want. The discussion now revolves around what the Church says instead of what it does…
  • Lenny on the role the courts play in the class war.

Met thugs forced to pay damages for wrongful arrests



The wheels of justice grind slowly, redux. Metropolitian Police have to pay 6,000 pounds in damage for wrongful arrests during the G20 protests:

At the time, protesters complained they were treated harshly because it had been a peaceful meeting. Some of the activists chanted “shame on you” at the officers during the raid which was subsequently posted on YouTube.

Ms McClure, of Leeds, and Mr Rubens, a Glasgow student, complained that they had been unlawfully arrested and held without reasonable suspicion.

They said they were made to stand in the street as officers compared the group with images of protesters that been gathered by intelligence teams.

Mr Rubens said in a witness statement to the court that he had been “very shaken up”.

In a statement, the force said: “The Metropolitan Police Service can confirm that it has settled a claim made by two people present at an address in Earl Street on 2nd April.

“We have accepted that they should not have been arrested and have agreed to pay them compensation. Any further claims will be looked at on a case-by-case basis.”

QotD: Laurie Penny on the Digital Economy Bill

The Digital Economy Bill is a typical New Labour product, a hideous mixture of Mandelsonian pandering to business and Labour’s usual authoritarian impulse. It won’t work, it can’t work, but it will have dramatic side effects. Laurie Penny puts it best:

Suppression of free speech isn’t just about direct censorship – it’s about creating a climate of cultural orthodoxy in which certain ways of behaving and sharing information are suspect, and then putting power in the hands of intermediary regulating authorities [ISPs, for example] to enforce that suspicion.

p.c. babble, or the only honest man in this is Gaddafi

So then Megrahi was freed, went home to Libya and got a heroes welcome, in the process providing us with yet another opportunity to witness how much political news is route, ritualised scripts. Was anybody surprised that the White House condemned the release? That the then director of the FBI as well as the American leader of the Lockerbie investigation were not best pleased? And of course the family and friends of those who died in the bombing are angry and upset, though interestingly there seems to be somewhat of a mid-Atlantic split in their attitudes, with the British survivors being more inclined to be merciful, if only because they’re more sceptical about Megrahi’s guilt. For the Americans this was all a bit of a bombshell of course, having missed much of the buildup towards the release and only hearing about it days or even hours beforehand.

All these responses could’ve been taken as read, none of them was “news” in any real sense of the word, but they still ate up hours of news time. As did the protests coming from Westminster about the way the Libyans treated Megrahi –did Gordon Brown really think either Gadaffi or the Libyan people believe in Megrahi’s guilt? Might as well expect the pilots involved in the 1986 US terror bombing of Tripoli to be made honorary citizens….

More interesting, the even more indignant and outraged squeels following Gadaffi’s thanks to Brown and the queen. Dropped Brown right in it, he did. Everybody knew or suspected that Megrahi’s freedom had been prepared from Westminster as much as Edinburgh, for example by having signed a prisoner exchange treaty with Libya a while back, that all the diplomatic spadework had been done from London,, but nobody mentioned it until Gadaffi. What a world we live in when it’s the “madman dictator” who tells the truth rather than the “democratically elected statesman”.

Because the truth is that Megrahi was just one concession given to Gadaffi for being a good boy and that all attempts to leave all responsibility soley to the Scots are just toytown Machiavellianism. Sure, the SNP is in the doghouse at the moment, but this will inevitably boomerang back to Westminster.

Meanwhile, why is it so hard to understand that Scotland has no control over the Libyan reception of Megrahi, that the Scottish justice system has no obligation to take into account the feelings of the US government on this matter, that the Libyans do not believe in Megrahi’s guilt, or that the feelings of his victims do not have or should have anything to do with granting his appeal for compassion?