On and On and On and On….

on and on and on....

Which is better, New US Left or Old US Left? Bit of a pointless question, in light of the fact that what America considers ‘left’ is, by international standards, pretty right-wing and at best gradualist in tendency. So the spirited yet essentially empty discussion going on over at the News Blog re a blogspat between Max Sawickyand Steve Gilliard is being conducted somewhat in the manner of two bald men fighting over a comb.

The argument goes like this (and I’m paraphrasing madly): Max said the New Internet Left is just a money sucker for the Democrats, and Steve replied that Marxism is boring, Marx is irrelevant and the Old Left were a bunch of a hippie nutters who were dangerous with it, who set back the left’s cause for generations, and who should just shut up and let the New Blogging Vanguard get on with it.

But both fail to lift their eyes above the American horizon, both fail to notice that the Left is an international phenomenon and neither acknowledge that the use of modern technology as a tool for political organisation is not confined to middle-class reformist Americans. (I get the impression that in their heart of hearts they think the ‘free’ market will sort it all out if only the Dems can get elected. Then things can go on as normal and they won’t have to change their comfortable lifestyles at all. Change the system? Why… that’s crazy revolutionary talk!)

Both Gilliard and Sawicki seem to have internalised the reformist view that US voters just need to get rid of Bush, fiddle round the edges a bit and everything’ll be fine and dandy and politics can go on as usual.

Read More

Oh, The Strain Of It All

I just popped out to feed the cats only to find that there are crocuses in flower in the windowbox outside. I planted them at the end of September, not expecting to see much till the end of January at least. No sign of any of the winter and early flowering bulbs at all, not even small shoots, which is a bit worrying; they need the cold and it’s been so warm and wet I think they may’ve rotted in the ground.

I suspect gardening’s going to be even more trial and error from now on and all planting advice will be suspect because of fluctuating conditions.

If this is happening in our pocket-handkerchief courtyard how much more devastating the effect on subsistence farmers worldwide must be : for me (at least for the moment, who knows what the future holds) global warming is just an inconvenient oddity and a gardening challenge. Whether I eat today is not dependent on the weather, nor whether my children go to school, have shoes or clean water or retroviral drugs.

No, my life is actually quite nice. So why can’t I enjoy it?

It’s a beautiful day, the sky is blue and the air still and crisp, the perfect day to get on a bike and do some Christmas shopping around the grachten, where the festive lights on the gracefully curved bridges are reflected twinkling in the canals and all is safe, warm, prosperous, pleasant and deeply self-satisfied in that cosy yet stylish Dutch way.

Most unlike conditions in the world’s megacities, which are growing steadily more overcrowded because of inward migration; people from climate-ravaged farms and countryside desperate for the chance to work 80 hours a week for 5 pence an hour, for the likes of such respected high street names as Tesco, Asda-Walmart or Primark. It’s not just a few flowers that are going crazy it ‘s whole harvests and agricultural systems and the resulting migrations are huge, making the population repercussions of the Industrial Revolution look like a small wet demographic fart. (Mind you it is Dickensian, so at least it has the saving grace of festive appropriateness).

Those people in those megacities and factories are what’s propping up this beautiful city and its pleasant liberal lifestyle. These smartly dressed burghers and their spouses make a nice living moving around the goods and cash those people produce for their owners. We live comfortably because they don’t. We are inextricably linked but it’s a death-dancel that most of us feel individually powerless to do anything about – nor do we want to while life is so gezellig.

There are millions just like me today all over Europe, out festive shopping, taking the opportunity of this lull between storms and trying to get one last good Christmas in before it all gets shot to shit.

Despite appearances many are, like me, grimly aware of the actual cost of the life we’re living. We just don’t know where to start doing something about it, so we’re going shopping. (We’re also trying to forget for one day that the future of Iraq and the Middle East and the likelihood of an unprecedentedly vicious transnational war between Sunni and Shia are dependent on the petulant whim of a man teetering on the edge of full-blown insanity but let’s not talk about that.)

So if you see me out and about around the Negen Straats today, one amongst many other smug, reasonably smartly-dressed but not too flashy middle-aged matrons laden with full, moderately priced but not too cheap carrier bags, recognise that I’m not enjoying myself at all: I too am suffering horribly. My neck aches with the strain of trying to deal with the liberal guilt.

Pity me, sit me down and buy me a coffee, but just make sure it’s Fair Trade.

Read more: Christmas, Amsterdam, Liberal guilt and hypocrisy

It’s A Small World, After All

Now see, this is the reason I blog, so that someone else will take the ball and run with it.

Yesterday I posted a rather flip comparison using the latest global wealth inequality figures and a letter to the WSJ. but Belledame took those figures, broke them down, and extended her research to show how those global inequities are actually mirrored in the US and how, despite the continued mass delusion of belief in the Americam Dream, it’s no accident that the American rich keep getting richer and the poor, poorer.

And that ‘poor’ means you. What? You didn’t really think you were middle-class did you? Do you own your own means of production? No? Could you survive independently beyond maybe one or two last paychecks? No? That fat pension fund you’re were relying on, is it invested in the markets? Then it could disappear tomorrow: you’re working class just like the rest of us. Deal with it.

So many are in denial of this reality though. As Belledame says:

I’ll be honest. I had a bunch of reasons for not tackling this shit before; dunno if they’re the same as y’all’s or not. Well, one, I suppose relatively speaking I am comfortable enough to sort-of pretend this isn’t actually happening (although denial works in mysterious ways, doesn’t it); certainly more so if you factor in my family background, who by now i expect is in, oh, i don’t know what percentile, but i suspect it’s up there. Not in the supra-wealthy micro-fraction percentile, no, but…and especially globally…so.

And, gender stereotypes or not, I’ve always had issues with numbers, personally. I wasn’t kidding: math and anything related literally gives me nightmares. (I dread my upcoming statistics class).

And let’s face it: this shit’s boring compared to, oh I don’t know, blowjobs.

And yet.

Somehow, you know, call it a hunch; i have the feeling that even if I, we, most, all? of us? don’t start concerning ourselves with this shit pretty soon?

It’s gonna concern itself with us.

Well yes, it is going to. It’s inescapable. Create an unsustainable global economic system and everyone suffers whenit all goes pear-shaped.

As a long time Euroweenie socialist these sorts of glaring inequalities are not news: they are the reason for our huge protests at every G8 summit. So I posted the link rather glibly assuming it was recieved wisdom.

From a European perspective it does sometimes seem as though America is living in its own self-created bubble and doesn’t see or even want to see the self-created potential wave of global misery headed its way and which according to your figures, is already lapping at American feet.

Schadenfreude, though tempting, is pointless at this late stage because we’re all affected by this new reality of resource wars, declining quality of life and a fucked-up planet. On the streets of Amsterdam you can see people from all over the world who’ve had to flee to safety for whatever reason, economic, climatic or political, from their home countries, largely as a result of the rampages of international capitalism and the arms trade.

And every day drowned young Africans wash up on the shores of Italy and Spain, or Eastern Europeans and Asians asphyxiated in containers at Dover or Calais, desperate to get away from grinding poverty and warfare. So far the US has been insulated from many of the worst effects of global capitalism like these, but not for much longer.

If not for posts like Belledame’s about the way the current economic model affects Americans personally they’d never know it’s happening till it’s too late. Is there any reporting of this on US TV? I certainly haven’t seen it on Fox or CNN.

Americans’d be surprised at the goodwill that’s still out there though: we still don’t hate Americans per se, despite Iraq, despite everything – we know you’re just like us. Mostly. We just loathe what the guzzling juggernaut that your nation has become is doing and the way it’s driving the rest of the world into poverty to fuel its own temporary comfort and prosperity and its insane competition with China and India.

BTW, I’m British, and Britain is as prime an offender as the US. Our government talks about tackling global poverty, but Brown & Blair’s Britain’s right in there hoovering up capitalism’s crumbs, making money from moving all the money around, all the while applying free-market US business models to public services like the NHS and water supplies and being one of the biggest arms traders on the planet. Oh, and don’t get me started on the GATT agreements…

We’re also completely exasperated by US media and governments’ refusal to see the looming danger – even when the facts and figures are staring them in the face – because it doesn’t fit the mythical national narrative they’ve constructed, of ever expanding profits, military glory and boundless influence.

Unfortunately for that narrative and those who still beleive in it, so far history is heading exactly in the way Marx predicted.

How angry are the American people going to be when they realise this and that they’ve been had? Will they even realise it? And if they do how will that angry realisation manifest itself, if at all? I think all bets are off on what happens in US and consequently global, politics in the next 5 years. Events are moving so fast now any prediction is contingent and the rollercoaster is accelerating.

Is socialism the answer to such gross inequalities? Revolution? What? Is it too late already? I don’t bloody know, I’m just a blogger. At least some of us are attempting to create some equity even if it’s only by making the current obscene situation better known.

But whatever your politics, surely our common humanity says that such massive inequalities as these are totally unjust, unsustainable and something has to give globally, and soon.

Read more: Global inequality, Capitalism, Anticapitalism, Marxism, US

Reforming the Democratic Party

By challenging the useless idiots in primaries:

The Democratic Party is never going to change substantively and again become a reform party with a serious agenda until some of its blood is spilled in the same fashion. For years, incumbent Dems have distanced themselves from fundamental convictions, confident the party’s “base” wouldn’t do anything about it beyond whimpering. Until now, the cynicism was well founded. Galvanized by the war, disgusted with weak-spined party leaders, the rank-and-file may at last be ready to bite back.

The fuse was lit for Lieberman a few weeks ago, when MoveOn.org let it be known that the web-savvy organization will support a challenger if that’s what its Connecticut members decide to do. “Our first allegiance is to our members,” explains Tom Matzzie, MoveOn’s Washington director, “and they are just as frustrated with the Democrats as anybody else. So they’ve given us the charge to change the Dems, and we’re taking that very seriously.” Politicians and media learned to respect MoveOn in 2004, when it proved its ability to organize people and money.

The center-right senator, meanwhile, is practically taunting the party’s loyal voters with his extreme embrace of Bush and Bush’s misbegotten war. “What a colossal mistake it would be,” Lieberman lamented recently, “for America’s bipartisan political leadership to choose this moment in history to lose its will.” Party leaders in DC–Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and Howard Dean–all took shots at him. Rumors started that Lieberman must be fishing for a job in Bush’s Cabinet.

A showdown in Connecticut–rank-and-file voters versus the big money bankrolling the party–would provide a fabulous test case, sure to attract maximum funding from Lieberman’s patrons in business and finance. The prospects for denying him the party nomination in the primary look encouraging, Matzzie says, citing private polling he won’t discuss. Voters are bitter about Iraq but also about Lieberman’s toadying to corporate interests. If the senator gets past the 2006 primary, he would still be deeply wounded and vulnerable for the general election. It’s too early to know whether a viable Democratic challenger will emerge, but the search is on. Lowell Weicker, the much admired former governor and senator, has proclaimed that if nobody else of stature will take on Lieberman, he will do it in the general election as an independent. Weicker, a maverick and liberal Republican, has the stature to pull it off, though a three-way race might backfire by splitting the anti-Lieberman vote.

Democratic leaders in Washington naturally discourage the talk of insurgency, warning it could endanger the party’s chance of regaining a majority in the House or Senate. Some progressives doubtless agree. But this is the same logic- -follow the leaders and keep your mouth shut–that has produced a long string of lame candidates with empty agendas, most recently John Kerry in 2004. The strategy of unity and weak substance led Democrats further to the right, further from their most loyal constituents. And they lost power across the board.

MoveOn doesn’t believe in kamikaze politics, Matzzie says, and won’t get into the race unless local members are committed and have a plausible challenger. “We have to make sure we can back up our swagger,” he says, “so it’s not just talk.” Other antiwar forces are less cautious than MoveOn, more willing to support long-shot candidates and at least deliver a message to the hawks. Progressive Democrats of America, with activists across the nation, is pushing antiwar resolutions in state party organizations and searching for viable peace candidates. In California activists are shopping for a primary challenger to Senator Dianne Feinstein (antiwar heroine Cindy Sheehan has been approached). A candidate was lined up to run against House minority leader Nancy Pelosi until Pelosi got religion and endorsed Representative John Murtha’s call for speedy withdrawal. In New York a little-known labor activist, Jonathan Tasini, plans to run against Senator Hillary Clinton.

Liberal extremism

Eschaton on “liberal extremism”:

The wingnuts run the Republican party. The center runs the Democratic Party. The ‘liberal extremists’ only hurt the center because people like CalPundit keep apologizing for them. It’s a great way to get a Fox News gig – you know, “Even the liberal CalPundit doesn’t like those icky Gay Rights parades. Not because there’s anything wrong with that, but because they’re hurting their cause which he cares so deeply about.” Calpundit might want to look into the recent history of the gay rights movement, particularly ACT-UP. They realized quickly that the only way to get media attention to the fact that people were dying was to Make a Big Noise. They did, it worked.